Foto: Schmuckelement.


Many pesticide multiresidue methods (MRMs) used are complicated, laborious, time-consuming, require high amounts of solvents and are therefore expensive. Considering that the time spent for instrumental analysis is also continuously growing due to the introduction of new analytes and instrument techniques, laboratories are not able to analyze the number of samples they would like to. In addition, some important analytes can not be satisfactorily covered by many common MRMs (e.g. basic, acidic and very polar compounds). In order to cover such analytes, laboratories have to additionally perform laborious single analyte methods, which is often not possible. This results in a large grey area of pesticides which are not routinely monitored by most laboratories.

traditional methods

In the last decade there has been a general trend to develop faster analytical methods. The automated instrument based extraction procedures SFE and ASE, which were introduced in the mid 1990s to speed up extraction, did not succeed to replace traditional multiresidue approaches. Ideally, a multiresidue method should be fast and easy to perform, require a minimum amount of chemicals, provide a certain degree of selectivity to avoid complicated cleanup procedures and still cover a sufficiently broad spectrum of analytes. Analysts accustomed to performing complex traditional analytical procedures often hesitate to switch to simpler ones assuming that a simpler and faster analytical procedure can not be accurate enough and should, if at all, only be used for screening procedures. In reality, however, the more analytical steps a procedure entails and the more complicated it is the more likely is the introduction of systematic and random errors.

During the development of the method the principal aim was to make it as stream-lined as possible by avoiding complicated and time consuming analytical steps.

Time-Consuming, Complicated
or Error-prone Steps
Simplified Alternatives
Sample Processing/HomogenizationSimplified No Way Around this
Blending (e.g. with Ultra-Turrax) Shaking
Filtration Centrifugation
Multiple Partitioning Steps Single Partitioning (“On-line”-Approach)
Separation/Transfers of Entire Extract Take Aliquots (Use ISTD)
Use of a Lot of Glassware Extraction/Partitioning in Single VesselLarge
Evaporation/Reconstitution Large Volume Injection; Sensitive Instrument
Classical StepsClassical SPE with Columns & Manifold Dispersive SPE

A schematic view of the analytical procedure is shown below. The entire method was published from Anastassiades and Co-workers in the Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL in 2003 (see Literature).

Working StepPicture No.Workflow
Weigh 10 g of Sample (50 mL Teflon-Tube)1
Add 10 mL Acetonitrile2
Shake Vigorously 1 min3
Add 4 g MgSO4 and 1 g NaCl4
Shake Vigorously 1 min3
Add ISTD-Solution5
Shake 30 s and Centrifuge3 - 6 - 7
Take Aliquot and Add MgSO4 (and Sorbent)8
Shake 30 s and Centrifuge9 - 10
(Add 0.1% HAc and "Analyte Protectants")11

top of page

last update: 2011-05-13